File #: HPB Reso 08-2018    Name:
Type: HPC Resolution Status: Public Hearing
File created: 12/4/2018 In control: Historical Preservation Commission
On agenda: 12/17/2018 Final action: 12/17/2018
Title: A resolution of the Historical Preservation Board concerning a Certificate of Historic Appropriateness for Littleton Mixed Use, 2679 W. Main Street
Attachments: 1. Staff Report, 2. Code and Criteria LInks, 3. Draft HPB Resolution 08-2018, 4. Public Notice, 5. Application Materials, 6. COA Plan Set, 7. Reference Document: COA17-0001, 8. Presentation

Agenda Date: 12/17/18

 

Subject:

Title

A resolution of the Historical Preservation Board concerning a Certificate of Historic Appropriateness for Littleton Mixed Use, 2679 W. Main Street

Body

 

Presented By:

Andrea Mimnaugh, Historic Preservation Planner

 

REQUESTED BOARD ACTION:

Request to approve a Certificate of Historic Appropriateness (COA) for installation of an automated teller machine (ATM) and a deposit box within the storefront of the Littleton Mixed Use Building.

 

PRIOR ACTIONS OR DISCUSSIONS:

Two previous COAs have been approved for the Littleton Mixed Use: a COA for the overall design of the new building and a COA to modify the doors and windows.

 

A COA requires a quasi-judicial decision in conformance with the City of Littleton Rules of Procedure for Quasi-Judicial Proceedings.

 

CRITERIA & STAFF ANALYSIS:

Staff reviewed the proposal for an ATM and deposit box in the storefront of the Littleton Mixed Use for compliance with the criteria set forth in section 4-6-14(C) of the Littleton City Code (LCC) and the Downtown Littleton Design Standards.

 

Please reference the following attachments regarding this application:

1.                     Staff Report

2.                     Code and Criteria Reference Links

3.                     Draft HPB Resolution 08-2018

4.                     Application Materials

5.                     ATM Specifications

6.                     Deposit Box Specifications

7.                     COA Plan Set

8.                     Reference Document: COA17-0001

 

OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES:

The historical preservation board may take the following actions on the application: approve; approve with conditions; continue to a date certain; and deny. A sample motion is provided for each option along with suggested findings.

 

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff finds that, in compliance with Section 4-6-14(C) of the Littleton City Code, the proposed Certificate of Historic Appropriateness for 2679 W. Main Street meets the criteria for approval. Staff, therefore, recommends approval of HPB Resolution 08-2018, approving the Certificate of Historic Appropriateness for 2679 W. Main Street.

                     

PROPOSED MOTION:

Proposed Motion

Motion to Approve and/if necessary, with Conditions

I move to approve HPB Resolution 08-2018, approving the Certificate of Historic Appropriateness for 2679 W. Main Street, the Littleton Mixed Use Building, with the following condition(s): 

1.

2.

 

Motion to Continue to a Date Certain

I move to continue the public hearing on HPB Resolution 08-2018, concerning the Certificate of Historic Appropriateness for 2679 W. Main Street, the Littleton Mixed Use Building, to __________ (insert date) in order to_____________________.

 

Motion to Deny

I move to deny HPB Resolution 08-2018, concerning the Certificate of Historic Appropriateness for 2679 W. Main Street, The Littleton Mixed Use Building. The foregoing denial is based on the findings that the proposed work:

 

Note: Identify criterion or criteria not met and adjust motion accordingly:

1.                     DOES / DOES NOT detrimentally alter, destroy or adversely affect any architectural or landscape feature which contributes to the original historic designation;

2.                     IS NOT / IS in conformance with the Littleton Downtown Design Standards and Guidelines;

3.                     IS NOT / IS visually compatible with designated historic structures located on the property in terms of design, finish, material, scale, mass and height; and

4.                     IS NOT / IS visually compatible with the development on adjacent properties.