File #: Ordinance 27-2018    Name:
Type: Ordinance Status: Passed
File created: 7/10/2018 In control: City Council
On agenda: 8/7/2018 Final action: 8/7/2018
Title: An ordinance on second reading amending city charter section 58 regarding establishment, appointment, qualifications, term, etc., of judge
Attachments: 1. Ordinance No. 27-2018, 2. Staff Presentation - Charter Section 58
Agenda Date: 08/07/2018

Subject:
Title
An ordinance on second reading amending city charter section 58 regarding establishment, appointment, qualifications, term, etc., of judge
Body

Presented By:
Steve Kemp, City Attorney

REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Does city council support amending city charter section 58 regarding establishment, appointment, qualifications, term, etc., of judge?

BACKGROUND:
The Littleton City Charter was adopted in 1959. Amendments were made in 1969, 1975, 1987, 1991, 1997, 2004, 2013 and 2015. The Charter Review Committee of 2015 recommended ten amendments be placed on the ballot, seven of which were approved by the voters. There were an additional 20 amendments recommended to city council that were not placed on the ballot.

On May 22, 2018, city council held a study session to consider additional charter amendments, most of which are "housekeeping" in nature, designed to make the charter more usable and to reflect current practices.

PRIOR ACTIONS OR DISCUSSIONS:
Study session on May 22, 2018. Ordinance passed on first reading at the July 17, 2018 regular meeting of the city council.

STAFF ANALYSIS:
The city charter provisions concerning the municipal court refer to a judge of the court. This dates back to a time where a sole, part-time judge performed these duties. Currently, the court has a presiding municipal judge who oversees the court functions as a separate branch of government.

The charter states that council appoints associate municipal court judges. This implication is contrary to the constitutional provisions providing for separation of powers and the recognition of the court as a separate branch of city government. Further, the courts have recognized that implicit in separation of powers is the provision of a defined term for judicial officers.

The proposed charter amendment uses the correct term of presiding municipal judge to refer to the judge in charge of the court and its operations. Further, the proposed cha...

Click here for full text