File #: PC Reso 15-2018    Name:
Type: PC Resolution Status: General Business
File created: 6/15/2018 In control: Planning Commission
On agenda: 7/9/2018 Final action: 7/9/2018
Title: Resolution regarding the updated Downtown Design Standards and Guidelines, now entitled the "Downtown Littleton Design Standards"
Attachments: 1. PC Resolution 15 - 2018, 2. Littleton Downtown Standards - for PC July 2018, 3. Public Comments

Agenda Date: 07/09/18

 

Subject:

Title

Resolution regarding the updated Downtown Design Standards and Guidelines, now entitled the “Downtown Littleton Design Standards”

Body

 

Presented By:

Jocelyn Mills, Community Development Director

 

REQUESTED BOARD ACTION:

The request is to consider adoption of the updated Downtown Design Standards and Guidelines, now entitled “Downtown Littleton Design Standards.”

 

Per Title 2, Chapter 9, Section 1 (D) of the City Code, Planning Commission “may make and adopt such design guidelines it deems necessary to guide development occurring within the city.”

 

On June 18, 2018, the historical preservation board held a meeting and heard and considered public comment when voting 6-1 to recommend adoption of the Littleton Downtown Design Standards.  The nay vote was from member Kastner who indicated he had been out of town and had not had a chance to read the document.  City council will consider ratifying the document at their July 17, 2018 meeting.

 

BACKGROUND:

In 2006, the historical preservation board and planning commission adopted the Littleton Downtown Design Standards and Guidelines. In the twelve years since they were adopted, the pace and type of development in Downtown Littleton has changed dramatically. As one step in responding to these changes, city council directed staff to undertake a public process to review and update the design standards and guidelines by (1) revising the document to be more user-friendly and (2), when viable, transforming guidelines into standards.

 

To accomplish this project, the city hired Littleton consulting firm Bryant Flink Architecture + Design and assembled a technical advisory team. The technical team included professional representatives from the historical preservation board, planning commission, downtown businesses, and downtown property owners.

 

The charge to the consultant and the technical team was to make the document more user-friendly and the design standards and guidelines more enforceable. The number and extent of changes that would require a policy discussion have been minimized; instead, the focus has been on technical and editorial changes. Changes that would require a policy discussion have been identified and set aside for a possible future project. The document has been shortened by eliminating duplication, made more user-friendly by reducing technical jargon, and updated with current Littleton photos and new graphics. To increase the document’s enforceability, the consultants, technical team, and staff evaluated each guideline for its ability to be converted to a standard. Those guidelines determined suitable were converted to standards. Guidelines that could not be converted remain as guidelines.

 

PRIOR ACTION OR DISCUSSIONS:

Starting in December, 2017, the technical team met six times with staff and consultants. The draft document that resulted from those meetings was presented at a community open house on April 18 and posted on www.OpenLittleton.org <http://www.OpenLittleton.org> between April 18 and May 1. Comments from Open Littleton and letters we received from individuals are attached to this staff communication.

 

On April 23, the draft was reviewed and discussed at a joint study session of the historical preservation board and planning commission. The consultant incorporated the comments from the first open house, the joint study session, and planning staff into the draft, which was presented at a second community open house on May 24 and a May 30 study session with planning commission. Comments from the May 24 open house, and the May 30 study session have been incorporated into the Downtown Littleton Design Standards document.

 

Comments and conditions from the historic preservation board members also have been included into this final draft.

 

CRITERIA AND STAFF ANALYSIS:

The 2014 Citywide Plan identifies as part of the vision, the importance of respecting the community’s history.  The Downtown Littleton Design Standards appear to meet the intent of the following goals (and stated policies within each goal area), as stated in the Citywide Plan:

                     Goal 1:  A Dynamic Littleton.  Foster a vibrant and evolving community.

                     Goal 4:  A Distinctive Littleton.  Maintain and expand upon the characteristics that make Littleton an authentic and distinctive community.

o                     4.2 Encourage preservation of historic structures, districts, and places that are significant to Littleton’s history.

o                     4.3 Encourage “architecture of place” and small, independent businesses that differentiate Littleton from nearby municipalities.

o                     4.4 Create distinctive gateways to the city, its downtown, and other points of interest.

 

OPTIONS/ALTERNATIVES:

The planning commission may take the following actions on this application:  approve, approve with conditions, and deny it.

 

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that planning commission approve the Downtown Littleton Design Standards.

 

Proposed Motion

PROPOSED MOTION:

Motion to Recommend Approval to Planning Commission and/if necessary, with Conditions

I move to approve PC Resolution 15-2018, to approve the Downtown Littleton Design Standards, [if needed] and subject to the following conditions:

 

Motion to Continue to a Date Certain

I move to continue the public meeting on PC Resolution 15-2018, concerning the Downtown Littleton Standards to __________ (insert date) in order to_____________________.

 

Motion to Recommend Denial to the Planning Commission

I move to deny PC Resolution 15-2018, to deny the Downtown Littleton Design Standards, based on the following reasons: