File #: ID# 18-190    Name:
Type: Report Status: General Business
File created: 5/30/2018 In control: City Council
On agenda: 6/5/2018 Final action:
Title: Presentation of the final draft of the updated Downtown Design Standards and Guidelines
Attachments: 1. Draft Downtown Design Standards - 05/24/2018, 2. PowerPoint Presentation, 3. OpenLitttleton.Org Comments RE: Downtown Design Guidelines (As of 05/22/2018)
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
Agenda Date: 06/05/2018

Subject:

Title
Presentation of the final draft of the updated Downtown Design Standards and Guidelines
Body

Presented By:
Dennis Swain. Senior Planner


SUMMARY:
Staff will discuss the progress and final draft of the update to the Downtown Design Standards. The intent of the study session is to answer questions and seek comments.

The current draft of the revisions, dated May 24, 2018, is attached and will be presented at the study session. Also attached are comments received on-line from OpenLittleton.org and in email and letters from individuals.

BACKGROUND:
In 2006, the historical preservation board and planning commission adopted the Littleton Downtown Design Standards and Guidelines. In the twelve years since they were adopted, the pace and type of development in Downtown Littleton has changed dramatically. As a first step in responding to these changes, city council directed staff to undertake a public process to review and update the design standards and guidelines by (1) revising the document to be more user-friendly and (2), when viable, transforming guidelines into standards.

To accomplish this project, the city hired Littleton consulting firm Bryant Flink Architects and assembled a technical advisory team. The technical team included professional representatives from the historical preservation board, planning commission, downtown businesses, and downtown property owners.

The charge to the consultant and the technical team was to make the document more user-friendly and the design standards and guidelines more enforceable. The number and extent of changes that would require a policy discussion have been minimized; instead, the focus has been on technical and editorial changes. Changes that would require a policy discussion have been identified and set aside for a possible future project. The document has been shortened by eliminating duplication, made more user-friendly by reducing technical jargon, and updated with c...

Click here for full text