File #: Resolution 10-2017    Name:
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 3/29/2017 In control: City Council
On agenda: 4/18/2017 Final action: 4/18/2017
Title: A resolution approving an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Urban Drainage and Flood Control District regarding High Line Canal funding for stormwater planning and an operational model.
Attachments: 1. Resolution No. 10-2017, 2. 2017 IGA with Littleton and UDFCD for Ken Macken Enzie Agreement
Agenda Date: 4/18/2017

Subject:
Title
A resolution approving an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Urban Drainage and Flood Control District regarding High Line Canal funding for stormwater planning and an operational model.
Body

Presented By:
Mark Relph, Public Works and Utilities Director

POLICY QUESTION:

Does city council support committing Storm Drainage Utility funds to prepare an outfall systems planning and operational model for the High Line Canal?

BACKGROUND:

The High Line Canal is an irrigation and water supply canal meandering through Littleton, from about Colorado State Highway No. C-470 to South Grant Street extended. The High Line Canal is owned and operated by Denver Water, who divert water from the South Platte River and deliver this water to their customers in the metro area. Denver Water has proposed to stop utilizing the canal for irrigation and water supply due to excessive water losses caused by evaporation and seepage.

The Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD), along with many local governments, completed the High Line Canal Feasibility Study for Stormwater Runoff Reduction and Treatment in August, 2014. The study determined it may be possible to collect urban stormwater runoff within portions of the canal. This water may be able to be passively treated and utilized to support the diverse vegetation, wildlife and other uses along its banks. Most local governments along the canal have expressed interest in participation in a study to develop a model as to how to utilize stormwater as a resource.

Council approved in the 2016 budget, $50,000 for a project similar to what is proposed in the IGA, but just between the UDFCD and the City of Littleton; however, these funds were no expended due to interest from other local jurisdictions. The unexpended Storm Drainage funds were left in the utility and are reflected in the fund balance. It is now proposed to broaden the participation and for the City to enter into an ...

Click here for full text