Skip to main content
File #: Ordinance 47-2020    Name:
Type: Ordinance Status: Passed
File created: 11/11/2020 In control: City Council
On agenda: 12/1/2020 Final action: 12/1/2020
Title: Ordinance 47-2020: An ordinance on second reading amending Chapter 20, of Title 3, of the Littleton City Code regarding medical marijuana centers
Sponsors: City Council
Attachments: 1. 1. Ordinance No. 47-2020, 2. 2. Presentation_Ord. 47-2020 and 48-2020
Agenda Date: 12/01/2020

Subject:
Title
Ordinance 47-2020: An ordinance on second reading amending Chapter 20, of Title 3, of the Littleton City Code regarding medical marijuana centers
Body

Prepared by:
Reid Betzing, City Attorney

PURPOSE:
To approve on second reading an ordinance amending Title 3, Chapter 20, of the Littleton City Code regarding medical marijuana centers.

PRESENTATIONS:
Staff Presenter(s): Reid Betzing, City Attorney and Colleen L. Norton, City
Clerk
Additional Presenter(s): N/A

SUMMARY:
Citizen initiated ballot measure 300 went to the registered electors of the City of Littleton on November 3, 2020.

"Shall existing medical marijuana center licensees in the City of Littleton be permitted to sell retail marijuana on and after January 1, 2021?"

Election Results: Yes: 17,057 (64.8%)

No: 9,260 (35.1%)

In order to effectuate the vote of the citizens prior to January 1st it is necessary to make certain amendments to our licensing code concerning medical marijuana centers.

PRIOR ACTIONS OR DISCUSSIONS:
A study session occurred on November 10, 2020 to discuss and get direction on some of the changes that would need to occur.

This ordinance passed on first reading on November 17, 2020.

ANALYSIS:
Staff Analysis
Based on the passage of the ballot measure and subsequent discussion with Council two small amendments to the existing ordinance were made.

The first change is confirming that in measuring the buffer zones, the City wanted to clarify that those measurements included locations out of the City limits.

Additionally, based upon direction that was received by a majority of Council, while Council did not want to add a definition of park that would address one of the locations which is non-conforming to our current business license buffer zones, a majority of Council wanted the one location to be allowed to operate retail from their existing location without changing buffering language.

As such, language was inserted to a...

Click here for full text