File #: Ordinance 20-2024    Name:
Type: Ordinance Status: General Business
File created: 7/23/2024 In control: City Council
On agenda: 8/20/2024 Final action:
Title: Ordinance 20-2024: An ordinance on second reading amending various titles and sections of the Littleton City Code related to nuisances and nuisance abatements
Sponsors: City Council
Attachments: 1. 1. Ordinance No. 20-2024, 2. Nuisance Code Adpotion Presentation 082024

Agenda Date: 08/20/2024

 

Subject:

Title

Ordinance 20-2024: An ordinance on second reading amending various titles and sections of the Littleton City Code related to nuisances and nuisance abatements

Body

 

From:

James L. Becklenberg, City Manager

Prepared by:

Matt Knight, Community Development Director

Presentations:

Reid Betzing, City Attorney

 

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this ordinance is to update varying provisions of the city’s municipal code to: 1) clarify and centralize nuisance violations and enforcement mechanisms; and 2) provide staff with additional tools for gaining compliance and remediating non-compliant properties.

 

LONG-TERM OUTCOME(S) SERVED:

Safe Community; High-Quality Governance

 

DISCUSSION:

Staff is proposing the attached amendments to clarify, define, and centralize public nuisance violations as part of a larger effort to strengthen community living conditions and clarify the rights and responsibilities of property owners within city limits.

 

Further, the relevant sections of the sections being proposed for amendment have not been reviewed or updated since at least the early 1970s. The proposed amendments aim to modernize the requirements, eliminate inconsistencies in language, and provide staff with additional tools for gaining compliance, as well as creating a more consistent and defined process to address properties in violation of our nuisance designations. The following table provides a general summary of the proposed concerns and resolutions related to this code update.

 

Current Code Section

Concerns

Resolution

7-1 Garbage and Refuse

7-1-2 Definitions

Lacking definitions (i.e. responsible party; rubbish); require clarity in other definitions (3 definitions for garbage, which can be more concise);

Revise definitions, clarify existing.

7-1-4 Sanitary Inspectors

Lack of documentation where CM appointed "sanitary inspectors." Outdated phrase not used elsewhere in code.

Replace term "sanitary inspectors" with "code compliance officers"

7-1-5 Service provided by city/others

Only authorizes trash removal; not recycling.

Revise section to include authority for city to provide recycling.

 

 

Add clarifying language: In the absence of city services, requires property owner to provide for collection service through private entity or dispose of in landfill (pulled from existing 7-1-6 and language updated)

7-1-10 Containers Required

Responsible party is very specifically defined and doesn't encompass modern situations. Current language: "every owner or his agent, or the occupant of any store, hotel, commercial house, resident dwelling, building, flat, apartment or tenement."

Responsible party is broadened: "Responsible Party means a person or entity who has violated any provision of Title 7, and in the case of property violations, the responsible party may also include firms, partnerships, corporations, property owner, the occupant, lessor, tenant, or an individual or entity who, acting as an agent for or in any other legal capacity on behalf of the owner, has authority over the subject property."

 

Difficult to enforce current container requirements (i.e. requires 32 gallon containers; however, collection companies offer different capacities; container cannot be filled over 100lbs and water tight; metal or wood receptacle - many are plastic now)

Remove conditions that are difficult to enforce; include other requirements such as: containers cannot impede pedestrian/vehicular traffic; containers to be kept in a manner so as to preclude scattering/spilling of trash/recycling; place trash container, fitting securely within container.

7-1-11 Dumping Restrictions

Nuisance provision with fines on dumping restrictions only; no notice provision (lacking due process), no clear enforcement avenues for each of the 'unlawful/prohibited' activities.

Remove and centralize nuisance provision within a new code chapter.

7-1-12 Garbage Grinders

1971 requirement of garbage disposals; can be handled through applicable international codes;

Removed.

 

 

 

7-2 Sewer Regulations (REPEALED)

 

Blank chapter; repealed in 1982

Will move new "Garbage and Refuse" Chapter into 7-2;

 

 

 

7-3 Noise Control

7-3-5(E) Truck Loading Operations

Truck loading encompasses all types in current language - refuse/recycling/products - within a restrictive time period and area (800' of residence). Difficult to enforce so staff has requested revision to separate haulers from delivery trucks.

Revise 7-3-5(E) to separate trash/recycling haulers from that of product/delivery trucks. Place timing restrictions and lessen area from 800' feet to 250' feet of a residential lot.

 

 

 

7-4 Weeds, Rubbish, Derelict and Abandoned Vehicles

Generally: Noxious Weed Act was passed in 1990; section will be updated to meet compliance with state law. Requires advisory board (city council) and management plan (updated ordinance)

7-4-1 Definitions

Vehicle definitions/offenses do not fit within "weeds, rubbish" provisions (i.e. derelict vehicles/hobby type vehicles)

Remove, centralize vehicle offenses within nuisance provisions within new code chapter.

 

"Noxious vegetation/weed" is incredibly specific; definition was last updated in 1995 and does not contain many of the newer "weed" like vegetation adopted by the state under the Colorado Noxious Weed Act.

Link definition of noxious weed to that of the state's definition (Any undesirable plant or part thereof which has been declared a "noxious weed" by the State of Colorado Noxious Weed Act or adopted by our council as a noxious weed). Our definition will automatically update if the state changes their definition.

7-4-3 Weeds and Rubbish

Separate notice/hearing/abatement/appeal process than other code enforcement matters

Remove and centralize within nuisance provisions within new code chapter.

7-4-4 to 7-4-8 (Failure to comply with notices to Other Remedies)

Separate enforcement provisions/avenues than other code enforcement matters

Remove and centralize within nuisance provisions within new code chapter.

7-4-9 Derelict or unlicensed vehicles

Does not fit within weeds/rubbish; Colorado Noxious Weeds Act in terms organization

Remove and centralize within nuisance provisions within new code chapter.

7-4-10 Abandoned Vehicles

Handled by LPD within Title 6

Removed from Title 7 so as to avoid any confusion on responsibilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

1-6-8 Municipal Court Process

 

Does not include "code compliance officers" or "sanitary inspectors"

Add "code compliance officers" so that they have the ability to issues summons and serve process for any complaints filed with municipal court.

8-1-4 Public Ways Kept Clear

8-1-4(A)

No time period on when snow needs to be cleared; no clear enforcement provisions;

Remove snow/ice provisions from 8-1-4 and centralize within nuisance provisions within new code chapter.

 

BACKGROUND:

Code Compliance, a division of the Community Development Department, is tasked with gaining compliance from property owners and residents with the various property maintenance codes that the city has adopted. Historically, Code Compliance has largely been reactive, or complaint based, by responding to complaints that are reported to the city regarding code violations related to properties within our city.  A large percentage of the complaints have typically revolved around the upkeep, or lack thereof, of properties such as snow removal, trash or junk accumulation, weeds, and unlicensed vehicles. Generally speaking, due in part to resources and political will, code compliance has typically not actively gone out looking for violations however a transition to “proactive” code compliance is underway, based upon direction from city council.

 

Prior Actions or Discussions

The City Attorney’s office and staff provided a study session on this topic on April 9, 2024, and July 23, 2024.

 

This ordinance passed on first reading on August 6, 2024.

 

FISCAL IMPACTS:

In cases where abatement is required, there would be upfront costs for the city to have the work performed.  Those costs would be recouped either through the property owner paying the abatement fees or through liens placed on the property.

 

STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 

Staff recommends that council approve the ordinance on second reading.

 

PROPOSED MOTION:

Proposed Motion

I move to approve Ordinance 20-2024 on second reading amending various titles and sections of the Littleton City Code related to nuisances and nuisance abatements.